Archive for December, 2006

What Is The Definition Of A Blog?

Written by on Sunday, December 31st, 2006 in Ajax News.

Yesterday Google posted the yearly stats for the Official Google Blog. Not bad - 294 posts, 7.6 million unique visitors and 15 million page views. Technorati ranks the Google Blog as the 16th largest among all blogs, and it is by far the most popular official company blog. Just one accidental deletion and a couple of hacks added a bit of spice and drama.

But today bloggers are starting to ask if the Official Google Blog is even an actual blog. The reason? It doesn’t allow readers to leave comments. The Official Google blog does list links to other sites referencing any given post (a sort of trackback), but that’s it. The conversation ends there.

Other prominent bloggers have removed comments, too. Seth Godin, no. 19 on the Technorati list, rarely allows comment on his blog. He says that comments affect what he writes, and “So, given a choice between a blog with comments or no blog at all, I think I’d have to choose the latter.”

The current definitions of “blog” in most dictionaries don’t mention reader comments at all when defining the term. Wikipedia says only that “the ability for readers to leave comments in an interactive format is an important part of many blogs.” According to these sources, the minimum requirement for a web site to be a blog is that it have content, and that it be sorted in reverse chronological order.

I believe the term “blog” means more than an online journal. I believe a blog is a conversation. People go to blogs to read AND write, not just consume. We’ve allowed comments here on TechCrunch since it started. At times, user comments can be painful to deal with. But they also keep the writer honest, and make the content vastly more interesting.

Should the definitions of “blog” be revised to exclude journals that do not allow reader comments? Yeah, absolutely.

What do you think?

Is a blog really a blog if there are no reader comments?

View Results

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

No Tags

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/69045538/

2006: The year in posts (part 6)

Written by on Sunday, December 31st, 2006 in Ajax News.

Netflix nails it
“Netflix nails the customer experience. From site design, to emails, to packaging, to coding, the company is a champion at delivering a great experience.”

The casino experience
“From a design/experience perspective, casinos are fascinating places.”

Fear, shark attacks, and “Will it scale?”
“Allocate your fear properly. When it comes to building a web app, some things create more fear than they should.

Fireside Chat: Dan Cederholm, Jason Santa Maria, Ryan Sims, and Greg Storey
“The guests chat about what they’re working on, Korean design, Web 2.0 hype, and whether RSS is killing creativity.

Design Decisions: Backpack page blank slate
“So for the new version of Backpack we’re working on right now we wanted to rethink the blank slate. We wanted to get to the point faster. Make a better connection between what you can do, how you can do it, and where you can do it.

The power of rough edges
“If your goal is to speak with a unique voice (like at a personal blog), be more human (a small company trying to emphasize intimacy), show off a distinct style, or stand out from the crowd? Then some rough edges and discord can work wonders. Consider it a shabby chic approach to web design.

The difference between trying something and using something
“There’s a big difference between trying something and using something. Trying something is more common than using something. That’s why most products are optimized for trying.”

Source: Signal vs. Noise
Original Article: http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/177-2006-the-year-in-posts-part-6

RawSugar In DeadPool

Written by on Saturday, December 30th, 2006 in Ajax News.

RawSugar (the site is currently down), a company with offices in Israel and Silicon Valley, is closing shop (also reported by Steve Rubel and Rafael Sidi) and will enter the TechCrunch DeadPool. RawSugar can mosts easily be described as a del.icio.us competitor.

This is a company we’ve been tracking since August 2005. This is also one of the companies that I met with during my trip to Israel last year.

RawSugar never raised a big round of funding and simply ran out of money, it seems. And while this is a bit sad to see, the good news to come out of this is that the people working on the project can now move on to their next idea. It’s the way things go.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/68650324/

2006: The year in posts (part 5)

Written by on Saturday, December 30th, 2006 in Ajax News.

Define your own success
“The best way to be successful is to define your own success. Success can be tiered too. If you want to eventually run a public company you can still be successful on your way there. If you want to stay small you can fight growth and remain successful too. It’s up to you, not up to someone else.”

3 ways to make money with your software
“There are three primary ways to generate revenue from web-based software. Let’s take a look.”

Buzzwords say all the wrong things
“These buzzwords are often a mask. People who use them are covering up their ideas — or the lack thereof. They are overcompensating. They don’t have anything substantial to say so they try to use impressive sounding words instead. But people who abuse buzzwords don’t sound smart. They sound like they are trying to sound smart. Big difference.”

“The man behind Apple’s design magic”
“This push for innovation in manufacturing is a big reason why Apple changes the rules of what’s possible. Most companies buy off the shelf stuff which means things look and feel the same (i.e. usually like crap). Apple’s efforts to discover new materials and production processes enables them to build things no one else can build.”

Confidence in people, process, and purpose
“If you trust the people, the process, and the goal, you don’t need all the bullshit trust-builders like specs, documents, and promises to make you feel secure. You can just make something good.”

The false fight between fun and business
“You don’t have to work hard to work well. You don’t need sinister eyebrows or only 4-hour sleeps or a booked calendar to be serious. But somehow that image sticks so bad that we tend to view fun as the opposite of Serious Business Stuff™.”

In-store good or at-home good?
“Every company/product has to choose priorities: In-store good or at-home good? First-minute good or lifetime good?”

Source: Signal vs. Noise
Original Article: http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/176-2006-the-year-in-posts-part-5

2006: The year in posts (part 4)

Written by on Saturday, December 30th, 2006 in Ajax News.

Writing words vs. writing software
“Whether we’re authoring software or prose, rewriting is key. Rewriting is when you turn good into great. It’s true for books, blog posts, marketing copy, interfaces, code, etc. For all of them, we grind it out. We get something down, share it, get feedback, revise, and then do it over again. We get where we’re going via lots of wrong turns.”

Pretty Propaganda: USSR in Construction
“In the 1930’s, the Soviet government wanted the world to believe it was living the dream: rapid modernization, economic miracles, etc. To support this cause, it created the magazine USSR in Construction, home to some of the most innovative graphic design of the past century.”

The dance of people in public spaces
“Architect and set designer David Rockwell was hired to design the ‘interior experience’ (arrival, departure, retail space) of the new JetBlue terminal being built at JFK Airport (Gensler handled most of the architecture). Looking for a new angle on movement vs. environment, Rockwell took a strange turn: He hired choreographer Jerry Mitchell to help him.”

Complicating simplicity
“Gah! Trying to read about the ‘Simplicity: The Art of Complexity’ (er, what?) conference. But the description at the conference site is the exact opposite of simple, clear writing.”

John Sawatsky and the power of simple questions
“According to Sawatsky, smart interviewers don’t try to sound smart. They are transparent. They stay away from leading (yes/no) questions, charged words, and drawn-out statements.”

Picasso, Paula Scher, and the lifetime behind every second
“Charging hourly vs. charging per project is always an interesting dilemma for designers/programmers who do client work. If you charge hourly and you solve problems quickly, you wind up being punished for your efficiency. But if you charge per project, you often face scope issues (i.e. endless revisions or changes in direction seem to become the norm).

The long road to simple: creating, debating, and iterating “Add an event”
“That ‘Add an event’ box at Backpack’s new calendar looks simple enough. But sometimes simple takes a lot of work. How we arrived at this screen is a good look at the process we use to solve design challenges.”

Source: Signal vs. Noise
Original Article: http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/175-2006-the-year-in-posts-part-4

Google’s Tipping Point

Written by on Saturday, December 30th, 2006 in Ajax News.

Taken in a vacuum, a fairly trivial thing happened a few days ago. The co-founder of Firefox, Blake Ross, wrote a post criticizing Google called “Tip: Trust is hard to gain, easy to lose“. He takes issue with a new Google search feature that promotes certain of their own products over organic search results. See Google searches for Calendar, Blogging, Photo Sharing and others and see Google pushing Google Calendar, Blogger and Picasa, respectively, above what is supposed to be the most relevant results - Google search. Even a search for Yahoo Calendar has these Google results above the obvious destination the user was searching for.

I say this is trivial incident taken in a vacuum because, quite frankly, Google has every right to promote their own products on their website. But I think Ross’ post may be a sign of a change in attitude towards Google that’s been percolating for the last year or so, and is beginning to manifest itself. The fact that a highly respected entrepreneur finally spoke out should be a wakeup call for Google.

Part of the problem is that Google has always held itself to a higher standard than other companies. We took them seriously when they said their corporate motto is “Don’t be evil“. It was the right thing to say when they were young and battling the hated Microsoft. But today, as they begin to put themselves before what’s best for their users, that motto is coming back to haunt them.

They can’t redact the motto, of course. They can’t take back those words. Google will forever be held to a higher standard than everyone else, simply because they asked us to.

This Google search misstep, aggregated with others, is taking a toll. People seem less willing to give Google the benefit of the doubt when they try something new. And with so many bloggers eagerly awaiting the opportunity to jump on any bandwagon that comes along, this subtle shift in public attitude could signal a tidal wave of negativity down the road.

We’ve seen this before. Yahoo, AOL and Microsoft were the darlings of the valley back in the late nineties. Just the fact that an entrepreneur got a meeting with one of them was something they brought up in their pitches to venture capitalists. The big three became very arrogant about their positions on the top of the food chain.

They had big revenue numbers to hit to keep the stock price soaring. Any kind of real business development deal took seven or eight figures just to get in the door. $10 million/year revenue guarantees became commonplace in deals. When the stock market crashed, and venture dollars dried up, so did the advertising market. Those big deals went away. Much of the revenue was never recognized because the companies promising it went bankrupt. Yahoo and the others were hit hard. Layoffs occurred and CEOs were fired. And the arrogance went away. Today, entrepreneurs tell me they are an absolute pleasure to deal with, and open to new and sometimes outrageous ideas.

Now Google is in the position of dominance, and they definitely have the arrogance that goes with it. But they are in a very difficult spot because of that damned motto, and perhaps right on the tipping point where public opinion could change. More and more, people are hoping for Google to stumble. And every time they do, the press pounces. And they always point to the motto.

Google needs to change. They can’t kill the motto, so they need to live up to it, permanently. They need to stop treating the outside world with disdain, and replace it with transparency and honesty. Users must always come first. Always. And they need to do it soon. Once the shift in public opinion becomes obvious, it will be way too late. And while Matt Cutts, the unofficial Google blogger, deals with the Ross post in a straighforward and honest way, I think he should be far more critical of his company. Even to the point of risking his job. Because that is exactly what Google needs right now.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/68471850/

Which Superhero Are You?

Written by on Saturday, December 30th, 2006 in Ajax News.

Geeks definitely love comic books and superheroes, and that’s why this simple site that tells you what superhero you are based on a few questions has seen over 12 million hits in the last couple of months. I really wanted to be Batman or Spiderman, but I answered the questions honestly and came up with the Green Lantern. I’m not at all happy that I am 45% Wonder Woman.

I’m only 70% Green Lantern though. Jason Calacanis is 75% Green Lantern, for whatever that means. Dave Winer is Iron Man. Steve Rubel is Superman. Which superhero are you?

Your results:
You are Green Lantern

Green Lantern
70%
Hulk
65%
Batman
65%
The Flash
55%
Robin
50%
Wonder Woman
45%
Spider-Man
45%
Iron Man
40%
Catwoman
35%
Supergirl
35%
Superman
30%
Hot-headed. You have strong
will power and a good imagination.


Click here to take the Superhero Personality Test

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

No Tags

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/68403487/

Ergonomic Roundup at CrunchGear

Written by on Friday, December 29th, 2006 in Ajax News.

As techies, there are few components that affect our bodies as heavily as our chairs. Sitting in a chair for countless hours every day has a notable impact on our bodies. A crappy chair can cause immediate duress and also lead to prolonged pain. A quality chair, however, can do a lot of good for you. Recognizing this dilemma, CrunchGear has conducted a stress test roundup of several of the top ergonomic options currently available in a piece entitled Workspace Roundup: Ergonomic Chairs.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

No Tags

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/68296321/

Performancing Blogging Plugin Now ScribeFire

Written by on Friday, December 29th, 2006 in Ajax News.

When PayPerPost announced the acquisition of most of the Performancing assets earlier this week, a lot of people asked about the future of the popular Performancing blogging plugin, which wasn’t acquired.

It’s alive and well and has been rebranded as ScribeFire. The site has a landing page up and will be launching shortly. In the meantime, the old plugin can stll be downloaded on the Mozilla site.

ScribeFire says that 400,000 people have downloaded the software. No word on how many active users there are, but a lot of bloggers swear by it.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/68278958/

35 most outrageous fees

Written by on Friday, December 29th, 2006 in Ajax News.

A lesson in how to get fleeced. Common example: If you want your airline ticket in paper you’ll have to pay $75 at United; $50 at American, Continental, Northwest and US Airways; $45 at Virgin Atlantic. [via Wheaties]

Source: Signal vs. Noise
Original Article: http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/178-35-most-outrageous-fees



Site Navigation