Archive for December 16th, 2007

People who don’t follow Loren Feldman are usually surprised when he takes aim at their startup and lets loose. He combines valid points with a highly confrontational approach (he once called me a “pompous elitist asshole” and I still consider him a friend). The results are usually entertaining and combustive. Quite often they also cross the line and could be called offensive.

Today Feldman went off on new video startup Seesmic (I am an investor). Since Feldman is a video guy, I would have assumed he’d like Seesmic. But he most certainly doesn’t. He posted a video attacking the site, its founder and its users in a highly aggressive way. Apart from the parts making fun of Europeans, I found it to be funny and included some valid points. The video is below - it is definitely NOT safe for work.

Founder Loic Le Meur, hot off a very successful Le Web conference in Paris, didn’t take it very well. You can sense his frustration in his blog response. The frustration is warranted, but this kind of thing is going to be occurring regularly, Loic. Time to get used to it.

Loading information about seesmic…

cb_widget_report_widget(”cb_widget_1197932828″); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_0_1197932828″,”seesmic”);

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201455938/

Bizarre: Al-Qaeda To Emulate YouTube Debates?

Written by on Sunday, December 16th, 2007 in Ajax News.

alq.jpgThe second in command of Al-Qaeda has asked for questions to be submitted to the terrorist network which he’ll then answer in an online interview next month.

Ayman al-Zawahri made the offer as part during a video release online where he mocks the British withdrawal of troops from Southern Iraq, claiming that the withdrawal shows that Al-Qaeda is winning.

The format of the questions was not made clear, for example would Al-Qaeda respond to questions submitted by video like the YouTube presidential debates, or should questions be via email only? Who will choose which questions are put forward? Will there be an exit-poll on the responses?

Bizarre.

(via news.com.au)

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201446332/

Who Will Google Buy Or Clone In 2008?

Written by on Sunday, December 16th, 2007 in Ajax News.

Predicting what Google may do in 2008 is about as accurate as predicting the future using a Magic 8 ball; you can make educated guesses but it’s nothing more than that. There are two certainties however; Google will acquire many companies and they will also launch a range of new products and upgrades to existing products. Here’s a few companies that Google may look at in 2008.

amazonsmall.jpgAmazon

The idea of a merged Google + Amazon into a new company Googlezon is an old idea. However Amazon keeps moving into spaces that Google would naturally be a candidate to be in.

Last week Amazon added SimpleDB to its suite of cloud-based IT infrastructure, which also includes storage (S3) and computation (EC2). They are appealing products, and S3 in particular has built a strong client base that as changed the dynamics of online storage. This is a space that Google would logically want to be in. Google is already offering paid online corporate service through Google Apps and they have the infrastructure to offer similar services to Amazon.

Of course the ecommerce side of Amazon is the cream on top. Google has been desperately trying to break into ecommerce with Google Checkout. Google recommending Amazon products via search would be a huge winner.

Rating: Emulate

Amazon’s $37 billion market cap puts it out of range for a Google cash acquisition, although a combination cash/ script offer is not beyond the realms of possibility. Google needs new revenue streams to keep up their continuing high growth rates in 2008, enterprise level hosting and service provision would seem a no brainer for Google, presuming they can get the tech/ implementation right.

sixapartsmall.jpgSixApart

SixApart has undergone a major refocus this year into what is now primarily a enterprise provider of blogging tools. The mostly free LiveJournal, a competitor to Blogger has been sold, and Movable Type has been open sourced, in part taking away the baggage of running (what was previously) a mostly free to use blogging platform. TypePad offers a serious blogging platform that companies are willing to pay for, something Google doesn’t currently have. Given Google’s push into paid enterprise platform provision TypePad would slot in nicely as an additional feature offered by Google. The stray in the SixApart package is Vox; it doesn’t seem like a natural fit for Google but it can easily be offloaded. A service such as TypeKey would fit nicely into Google’s Profile/ one login everywhere push.

Rating: possible buy

The alternative is Automattic, however WordPress.com competes primarily with Blogger, Akismet could be easily emulated and there’s not a lot of enterprise focused product on offer. There’s every chance that buyers will be circling SixApart in 2008, particularly as the original investors start looking for a buyout as the company hits 4+ years since its initial funding. Google seems like a natural fit, and they would easily be able to afford the maybe mid $xxx million figure.

ningsmall.jpgNing

The white label social network provider Ning is leading in its space, and of all the companies in this post, Ning is the most perfect fit for Google. As we saw with the announcement of Google Knol, Google is all about facilitating the creative desires of users, as does Ning. Google already offers its own free web hosting with Pages and blogs with Blogger, social networking sites fills the list out nicely. Ning would also mean that Google wouldn’t acquire a company that seriously competes with most of its partners in Open Social; instead of being a major social network owner, Google would simply become the biggest provider of social networks.

Rating: buy

Someone will buy Ning in 2008, Google would be the perfect buyer.

reuterssmall.jpgReuters

Google faces another battle this year with rights holders over news, a battle they could in part lose. Even now media outlets worldwide are trying to find ways of blocking Google from indexing their content. Reuters is one of the worlds top two providers of syndicated news and is profitable. Google wants what Reuters has.

Rating: very long shot buy

AP is owned by the newspapers and will never sell, Reuters is listed making it a possible acquisition target. Google is moving away from simply being the company that indexes the world to being the company that also offers content to the world as well. A Google controlled Reuters would radically change the face of news gathering world wide. Not only would Google have first rights to most of the news worldwide, it could also leverage that control in forming partnerships with media outlets, partnerships that challenge AP and the established order. The possibilities for Google would be great: discounted Reuters news in return for running Google ads or for being indexed by Google, Google offering to host news sites at no cost as part of a content deal, allowing Google to know who was reading what and when. Reuters video and similar visual products would feed into YouTube and Google images. Very much a long shot but an appealing one. Maybe a small stake might be more likely for Google? Either way, Google wants news content from somewhere and I’d bet they’d be willing to pay for it if the deal was right.

If you have any acquisition targets for Google you’d like to share, leave a comment.

Loading information about SixApart…
Loading information about Ning…
Loading information about Amazon…

cb_widget_report_widget(”cb_widget_1197927111″); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_0_1197927111″,”sixapart”); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_1_1197927111″,”ning”); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_2_1197927111″,”amazon”);

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201436829/

23andMe Step 2: Spitting In A Tube

Written by on Sunday, December 16th, 2007 in Ajax News.

Last week I was able to take the second step towards understanding my genetic trivia - the $1,000 23andMe kit I ordered on December 6 arrived.

I spent a few minutes reading the directions and then did as I was told - I spent 5 minutes or so spitting into the provided tube, mixing in a chemical that comes with the kit, and sealing it up for shipment. In 4-6 weeks, they say, I’ll get the results back and will know a little more about my essential me-ness.

It’s clear that the concerns I brought up in the last post about taking a sample from someone without their knowledge won’t work that well with 23andMe. The volume of spit required to complete the test is just too much not to raise someone’s suspicions.

And as luck would have it, I ran into co-founder Anne Wojcicki at a holiday party just a couple of hours after the spitting session. She said the 4-6 week window was the longest it would take to get back results, and that some people get them back in just a week or two. I asked her if she could do me a favor and make sure mine got done quickly. She politely declined, saying something about how their privacy protections make it impossible for her to single my sample out.

I also asked Anne how many kits have been purchased. I ran the question by her perfectly - I asked a string of easy questions that she answered quickly and then I snuck that one in (this almost always works when trying to get sensitive information out of entrepreneurs), but she was on the ball and her media training clicked in. No answer.

23andMe is also a very expensive social network. Account holders can share their genetic information with friends (or anyone really) and compare that information with respect to inherited traits, ancestry and global similarity.

I’ll post again when the test results come in. More photos from the test are here.

Side note: I also ran into photographer Lane Hartwell at the party last night. Boy was that an uncomfortable conversation.

Loading information about 23andMe…

cb_widget_report_widget(”cb_widget_1197924518″); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_0_1197924518″,”23andme”);

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201414353/

Do You Use Google For Vanity Searching? You’re Not Alone

Written by on Sunday, December 16th, 2007 in Ajax News.

pew.jpgA new study from the Pew Internet and American Life Project has found that 47% of American adult internet users have undertaken a vanity search in Google or another search engine.

The survey found that more people today have searched for themselves on Google (and others) than in 2002, when the figure was 22%. 53% of US internet users admit to having looked up information about work colleagues of someone they know, such as friends, relatives, colleagues, and neighbors.

Privacy online isn’t the big concern many TechCrunch readers would presume it was, with 60% of respondents saying that they are not concerned about information about themselves online. Interestingly the lack of concern would appear to be more focused on adult users, with the study finding that teens were more likely than adults to restrict who can see their private details online on sites such as MySpace.

(via AP)

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201398878/

Facebook Sues Porn Company Over Hacking Attempt

Written by on Sunday, December 16th, 2007 in Ajax News.

facebooklogo11.gifFacebook has filed a lawsuit against a Canadian porn company alleging that they attempted to hack Facebook’s servers.

Istra Holdings Inc trading as Slickcash is alleged to have tried to access Facebook’s servers at least 200,000 times in an attempt to access the personal information of Facebook users.

Facebook users though have nothing to fear, as according to court documents “These requests for information from Facebook generated error messages and were detected as unauthorized attempts to access and harvest proprietary information.”

According to the Toronto Star, Facebook was granted a court order forcing Rogers Communications and Look Communications to divulge subscriber information relating to the requests, which then led back to Slickcash.

Facebook has not asked for a specific figure, instead stating in the suit only that they have suffered damages in excess of $5,000 and that the “extent and amount of such injury and damage will be demonstrated at trial.”

Loading information about Facebook…

cb_widget_report_widget(”cb_widget_1197920792″); cb_widget_report_element(”cb_widget_0_1197920792″,”facebook”);

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Source: TechCrunch
Original Article: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/201395921/



Site Navigation